Thursday, June 9, 2011

amor amarillo

amor amarillo. Amor Amarilloamor amarillo. Amor Amarillo
  • Amor Amarillo


  • njboy
    09-11 01:38 PM
    -----------

    This is just USCIS backlogs, DOL is a separate agency and the labor backlogs do not count in this.
    --------------

    not true,, the DOL does not do labor certification for backlogged cases anymore..this work has been transferred over from the State workforce agencies/state departments of labor to the backlog reduction centers..So....while, the DOL is a seperate agency, the labor backlogs is no longer handled by them, it is handled by the BPC..




    amor amarillo. Cerati - Amor Amarillo Lpamor amarillo. Cerati - Amor Amarillo Lp
  • Cerati - Amor Amarillo Lp


  • jthomas
    06-07 10:11 PM
    ....... But its better not to apply for any government aid if possible. There are many people who have applied for unemployement. It would be interesting to find out if they had issues during the 485 approval

    1. Unemployment benifit is not a goverment aid. Its a insurance which is deducted from every paycheck.
    2. Goverment aid has increased the insurance from almost 6 months to almost one year. However we are not qualified for the goverment aid. Unemployment benifit people have given be 28 weeks instead of 54 weeks (in CA). One of my friend in Mass (boston) got 30 weeks instead of 59 weeks. So in this case they automatically remove us from goverment benifits.

    Apply or not its your personal choice. Research about it from good sources and if you wish apply for it.

    Secondly, Unemployment insurance is around 450 to 650 dollars a week and depends on the state. If you decide to apply for it then please think about CONTRIBUTING some dollars to IV.




    amor amarillo. Amor Amarillo / Yellowamor amarillo. Amor Amarillo / Yellow
  • Amor Amarillo / Yellow


  • mayitbesoon
    02-04 12:44 PM
    My husband's I-140 is pending at TSC receipt date Dec 07. The processing date is in Jan 2008. how can we enquire why his I-140 is still pending. no LUD what so ever.

    Contacted his HR. they say, they are waiting for reply from law firm.

    Other than form 7001 that needs employer signature, are there any ways to enquire into the delay?.
    Thanks.




    amor amarillo. RAMO AMOR AMARILLOamor amarillo. RAMO AMOR AMARILLO
  • RAMO AMOR AMARILLO


  • Canadianindian
    11-14 09:16 PM
    The December bulletin is extremely frustrating.

    Does anyone suggest another DC rally or another media campaign could bring some attention to our plight? I am up for either/both.


    Hello all IV members,

    I was wondering, the 7% green card allotment for each country, can than be considered as racial discrimination? I mean a law suit against USCIS for discriminating against skilled workers.

    A question for all you, what do you think is going to happen? will EB2 move fast in next few months, I don't understand how can U.S govt play will all our lives? We all have some personal decisions on hold,


    Lastly i feel, we should contact some high profile politicians in India, so they can put a question or make some time of arrangement for Indians who are stuck over here, we all know unites states is interested in nuclear deal, if some type of provision is put in there to help Indians in this country

    how about holding another DC rally?

    We have to do some big about all this crap!



    more...

    amor amarillo. (Amor Amarillo 1993)amor amarillo. (Amor Amarillo 1993)
  • (Amor Amarillo 1993)


  • jojet
    09-28 09:25 PM
    i am in the same boat.aos application reached nebraska july 2nd.checks not cashed.not in the system.clueless.




    amor amarillo. Amor Amarillo ~amor amarillo. Amor Amarillo ~
  • Amor Amarillo ~


  • reverendflash
    10-21 01:15 AM
    I actually like the negative space... but I would like to see the text off center, maybe to the southeast...

    IMHO

    Rev:elderly:



    more...

    amor amarillo. 2 - Amor Amarillo 3 - Lisaamor amarillo. 2 - Amor Amarillo 3 - Lisa
  • 2 - Amor Amarillo 3 - Lisa


  • tkasi
    07-27 12:04 PM
    Hi,

    My I-94 which was issued 2 years ago in the port of entry got expired(this I-94 was based on my previous employer "ABC". I have applied for H1 extention and got my 797 extended with new I-94 recently with my new employer "XYZ".

    My question is which I-94 details should I use while filing my 485. Obviously my labor was filed by "XYZ" company.

    Regards
    Kasi




    amor amarillo. Amor Amarillo / 3. Lisa / 4.amor amarillo. Amor Amarillo / 3. Lisa / 4.
  • Amor Amarillo / 3. Lisa / 4.


  • Eberth
    10-28 10:12 PM
    hehe, ok lost!

    yeah, and i have lots of trouble on getting new clients, because im a 16 years old high school student, and because of that, people think that is too much money for someone of my age, and others think that a person of my age cant do a professional job, that's the main problem i have :( and i dont know how to go and offer my services,i dont know even what to say ( maybe what reverendflash said with the sign hehe,:smirk: ) also if you could give me some advices, on how to offer webdesign, i'd be greatfull ;)



    more...

    amor amarillo. Gustavo Cerati Amor Amarilloamor amarillo. Gustavo Cerati Amor Amarillo
  • Gustavo Cerati Amor Amarillo


  • aadimanav
    11-02 12:31 AM
    Thanks SatyaRaj and Paskal.




    amor amarillo. Amor amarilloamor amarillo. Amor amarillo
  • Amor amarillo


  • gotgc?
    08-06 10:45 AM
    I have a EB2 - I140 (PERM) pending at Texas from 06/2006 and another EB3-I140 (RIR) pending from 06/2007. When my lawyer filed the EB2-I140, he filed it with a copy of labor from DOL (not original hard copy). He says he did not know it would cause such a delay. My EB3-I140 however was filed on labor approved from the Dallas BEC. It was filed with the original copy of labor. Are there any people like me, who have endured a long wait because they did not have the original labor ? Please post your experiences here .......

    I filed my EB3 LC Substitution I-140 with the copy of the labor. It has been pending since June 2006.



    more...

    amor amarillo. quot;amor amarillo quot;amor amarillo. quot;amor amarillo quot;
  • quot;amor amarillo quot;


  • simple1
    10-16 05:15 PM
    short answer. "titles are not a problem", only roles matter.

    Long answer: -withheld-. update your profile.

    Hi,

    My green card petition was applied under "Computer and Information Systems Manager" job title. Recently, I get a full-time job offer from another employer with a much lesser salary but, considering the current job market and economy, I've no other option but to accept it. There's one little kink in this new situation: the title for the job I've applied for labor does not match with the one I'm offered (Software Engineer)

    These are my questions:

    1. Do I really need to apply AC21 now?

    2. If I apply AC21 with Software Engineer title what could be the consequence

    3. What if I try to get a letter from my new employer with job title as Computer and Information Systems Manager or some similar title. Do you think it'll work?


    If anyone has better idea, please advise me. I'd really appreciate all your help.

    Thank you very much...




    amor amarillo. quot;amor amarillo quot;amor amarillo. quot;amor amarillo quot;
  • quot;amor amarillo quot;


  • Janisaris
    12-18 07:47 PM
    I also see lot of LUDs on my I485 application. We filed our application on July 19th but the receipt date is November 1st. We received all our EADs and APs within 3 weeks and got our FP done on December 5th. Since then I am seeing bunch of LUDs on my I485. Even today they accessed my file. I am EB3 India with PD May 2004. My I140 was approved in 2006 and got an LUD on November 11th.

    Just letting you know that you are not alone.



    more...

    amor amarillo. 02 - Amor Amarilloamor amarillo. 02 - Amor Amarillo
  • 02 - Amor Amarillo


  • cbpds
    10-05 10:07 PM
    I am asked to show my I 797 form by the Indian officer once I land in India from USA, not just once every single time :)




    amor amarillo. Amor amarillo by alehalperinamor amarillo. Amor amarillo by alehalperin
  • Amor amarillo by alehalperin


  • transpass
    08-01 12:42 PM
    I am pleasantly surprised and would like to thank Sen Menendez on behalf of all the IV members in his constituency for sponsoring visa recapture bill in Senate. Few days back when we called his office, his position was different. But because of we all calling and requesting for his support, he graciouly has agreed to take up our case. Speaking with his staff, I came to know that more than thousand calls were made to his office in support of the visa recapture bill.

    This is just my thinking...

    Sen Menendez vigorously supports family based immigration...I watched the failed comprehensive immigration debate on senate floor almost in its entirety. There, he was like a lone warrior arguing against the senators (Like Sessions) who said CIR bill encourages chain migration, etc...He was totally supporting visas that enable family reunions.

    hr 5882 supports recapture of lost family based visas along with those of employment based. So no surprise Sen Menendez introduced the senate version of the house bill...And that's good for us...and we will take it...



    more...

    amor amarillo. amor amarilloamor amarillo. amor amarillo
  • amor amarillo


  • kawosa
    08-19 01:11 PM
    I hear you, I've been in this country for last almost 10 years now. Came here to do my MBA too. The journey that began on Aug 2, 1999 is still continuing as of Aug 19, 2008... Anyways, best of luck to both of us.

    and again... congrats for passing today...
    go party and hope you have a great time :)




    amor amarillo. (amor amarillo)amor amarillo. (amor amarillo)
  • (amor amarillo)


  • ksrk
    08-21 07:40 PM
    I have a strange situation where I was thinking of AC21 all the while since January (Jul 02 Filer, TSC with Receipt# SRC 0722...).

    Now, I finally made my mind and about to get an offer (after labor day, they say).

    The lawyer says "don't think about AC21 now, because most probably your GC will be here within 3 months"

    My PD is July 31st, 2006.

    Dilemma: I don't want to screw up (or stretch the case un-necessarily) by changing employment just in case if there is an RFE. But then, I have to stay with my current employer for 6+ months AFTER GC as well, to be able to prove "permanent employment" intent.

    please advise if the timing (within 3 months) makes sense.

    Please also shed light on the permanent intent thing .

    Many thanks

    Not sure of terminology here, but some companies have policies to "go after" employees who leave immediately after getting their employment-based permanent residence. God knows there may be a law that allows the company to sue you for your "intent" of staying with the company for the sole purpose of getting your green card and not because you have a vested interest in doing your job for the company.
    While these policies/laws allow for the employee to leave the company after a "reasonable" amount of time (usually six months), if, however, the employee leaves the company within that timeframe, the company has good cause to argue that the employee had an intent of leaving the company from the beginning right after s/he obtained employment-based permanent residence.

    Not sure how much sense this made - the law is kinda fuzzy here, AFAIK. As is good with such matters, get professional advice from a good immigration attorney about what you need to do - always worth the money; the risk is not.



    more...

    amor amarillo. era un amor amarillo.amor amarillo. era un amor amarillo.
  • era un amor amarillo.


  • yabadaba
    06-22 02:54 PM
    bump up




    amor amarillo. amor amarillo: El providencialamor amarillo. amor amarillo: El providencial
  • amor amarillo: El providencial


  • paskal
    11-09 12:23 PM
    calling on your high skills...iv is you and me...remember!!




    amor amarillo. Amor amarilloamor amarillo. Amor amarillo
  • Amor amarillo


  • aamchimumbai
    07-23 12:05 AM
    All,

    I feel that those who concurrently filed I-140/485 in July 2007 are very lucky!

    Here is my situation -

    Previous Employer -
    EB3,PD-Jan'04,I-140 cleared. Switched in June 2007 and wasn't able to file I-485 in July 2007

    New Employer -
    EB2, PD-Dec'-07, I-140 (Feb'08 - pending)

    Question -

    Based on Jun'08 Visa bulletin the dates for EB2-India were at Apr'04. Filed for I-140/485 based on my old priority date for EB3 labor (Jan'04). Explaining USCIS for PD transfer.

    Well, folks at NSC did not understand the PD transfer concept and send my application back. Unclear as to what do now. I guess need to wait until the dates for EB2-India reach Dec'07 such that I can file.

    Any "Creative" thoughts on how to approach USCIS moving forward.

    Thanks in advance for your replies.

    Aamchimumbai




    coopheal
    05-05 12:20 AM
    Date of sign up: May 4, 2009
    Subscription Name: Donation to Support Immigration Voice (User: coopheal)
    Subscription Number: S-22G6*****


    Subscription Terms:
    $25.00 USD for 12 months
    ------------------------------------------




    Munna Bhai
    01-23 10:51 AM
    Let your new employer starts your GC, get PERM+I-140 cleared from your new employer untill then don't join them. Once I-140 is cleared, port your current PD to this new I-140 and join the new employer.

    GC is for future job, anyone in H4 can do it and even if you are not in this country, a company can sponsor you.

    Hope this helps.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment